If employees leave the organization within six to twelve months of being hired, then hiring is not equating to growth. Instead, hiring becomes simply replacing employees that leave; the organization continually fills the same job positions rather than growing its ability to deliver on its mission- Retention.

The Real Talent War is Not Hiring, It’s Retention

For years, many businesses have thought that hiring was going to lead to growth, and as you can see, hiring more employees is a way to grow your business. You have built campaigns around employer branding, and you have focused on how quickly you can fill open opportunities and other business-related metrics that will define success based upon the number of employees you have onboard.

 

However, the truth is that a large part of your growth and success is not dependent on how many employees you hire but how many employees you are able to keep once they are hired, and this is where most organizations are failing to put as much emphasis on retention as they are hiring.

 

Even though many companies are celebrating offer acceptances and new employees joining their respective teams, they are still experiencing high levels of turnover, disinterest from existing employees, and an overall decline in the amount of time employees remain with the company after being hired. This imbalance between recruitment and retention is not only an issue for HR departments but also represents a major business risk. This imbalance creates loss of productivity and business disruption and can impede to long-term growth of your business.

 

The Illusion of Hiring Success

The hiring process is a very visible aspect of an organization. There are lots of numbers, dashboards, and milestones associated with hiring that can be easily displayed and celebrated throughout the organization.

 

Metrics like time-to-hire, cost-per-hire, and offer acceptance rates provide organizations with an excellent perception of progress, while an organization with a solid hiring pipeline is often seen as progressing in terms of momentum and competitiveness in the market.

 

However, metrics regarding hiring do not give the complete picture.

 

If employees leave the organization within six to twelve months of being hired, then hiring is not equating to growth. Instead, hiring becomes simply replacing employees that leave; the organization continually fills the same job positions rather than growing its ability to deliver on its mission.

 

The costs associated with bad hires are significantly higher, as they extend beyond just the cost of hiring. The additional costs of bad hires include:

  • Temporary loss of productivity while transitioning to a new employee
  • Disruption of the team dynamic
  • Increased workload on remaining employees
  • Loss of institutional knowledge
  • Delays in executing projects

 

These hidden effects of attrition result in an institution having a knowledge gap, which is difficult to quantify but has an impact to the organization. Over time, the inability to perform with consistency will be eroded.

 

Organizations with aggressive hiring strategies but no retention will not experience growth; they are simply showing motion without progress.

 

Why Retention Has Become the Real Battleground

Today, the workforce is very different than it was just a few years ago. In fact, there are many factors that influence how employees make decisions about their employment. Specifically, the following factors are becoming much more important than the compensation package itself:

  1. Opportunities for advancement and skills development
  2. The quality of leadership and management support
  3. The quality of work you do, and how meaningful and challenging it is, as well as whether or not you see a purpose in doing it
  4. The amount of flexibility and work-life balance offered
  5. The degree to which your values align with the values of the company

 

Because these factors are all taken into consideration, the way employers make decisions about hiring and keeping talent is changing. Employees are no longer waiting for a situation to reach a breaking point before they look at other options for employment. Instead, they are beginning to explore other options while they are still engaged in performing their current jobs well.

 

Furthermore, employees who are disengaged from their jobs usually are no longer producing what they once did before they quit, and their disengagement typically begins long before they quit their job.

 

Once HR has a chance to identify this issue, it’s typically during an exit interview, at which point the employee has made their decision to leave. This type of reactionary approach limits the organizational ability to take action on behalf of the employee and ultimately results in losing them. Retaining employees is therefore less about trying to keep employees who are going to leave and more about the proactive action taken on behalf of employees, as well as being clear about the expectations of employees and fulfilling those expectations.

 

Retention Starts with the First 90 Days

One of the most important and underappreciated part of retention is onboarding.

 

Many companies see onboarding as a purely administrative function, it is about filling out forms, attending an orientation, and being given access to systems. Onboarding’s true impact can be much more strategic than that.

 

The first 90 days a new employee is a formative time to create their perceptions of:

  • The culture of the organization
  • What their role is and what is expected of them
  • Their relationship with leadership
  • What their future will be at that organization

 

These first 90 days also help to determine if the initial excitement about starting the new job translates into long-term commitment to the organization.

 

Some common gaps during the onboarding process are:

  • Misalignment between job expectations and actual responsibilities
  • Lack of structured onboarding plans
  • Limited interaction with leadership teams
  • Absence of early and meaningful feedback mechanisms

 

When newly hired employees fail to receive what was promised during hiring; the trust in the organization begins to erode. Employees may not leave right away, but they will quickly become disengaged.

 

Once employees begin to disengage, it will be significantly more challenging for the organization to retain them.

 

Retention does not begin when an employee is considering leaving the organization; it begins on the first day of employment.

 

The Role of Data in Retention Strategy

Currently, businesses have unprecedented amounts of data available to them. With this expansion of available data from engagement surveys to performance metrics, utilizing the data has surpassed availability as a major challenge for organizations today. Organizations focused on retention can leverage data in a manner that takes them from a reactive to a proactive decision-making mode. In retention, the most common ways to use data are: assessing potential signs of early disengagement; identifying patterns across teams, roles, and managers; utilizing behavioral indicators to project attrition risk; measuring the success of retention efforts.

 

Many indicators of early disengagement can be identified by looking for signs of decreased performance, reduced participation in team activities, or changes to communication patterns.

 

Organizations can take action prior to escalation through utilizing these metrics to identify what is happening early.

 

In this environment, organizations are no longer relying on exit interviews as their primary method of assessing retention. An exit interview is a reactionary means to collect data, while retention requires organizations to collect data proactively.

 

Retention as a Leadership Priority

The concept of retention has been traditionally regarded as an HR function, but it is really a responsibility of all leaders.

Leaders and managers are the most impactful to the employee experience through their influence over:

  • Team culture and communication
  • Clarity of expectations
  • Recognition and feedback
  • Alignment between organizational promises and reality

 

Numerous studies have shown that employees do not leave the organization, but rather leave their manager. When the manager engages in retention activities, it signals to the employee that he or she is more than a resource; instead, the employee is a key component of the organization’s business strategy.

 

Rethinking the Talent Strategy

We have to change how we discuss talent acquisition and hire employees, but we cannot rely on talent acquisition alone to achieve sustained success, as organizations need to hire new talent to grow their business and need new ideas and skill sets to be productive. Therefore, organizations should focus on acquiring and retaining employees by:

  • Designing roles with clarity and purpose
  • Aligning hiring promises with actual experiences
  • Investing in continuous learning and development
  • Building leadership capabilities at all levels
  • Using data to drive proactive retention strategies

 

If organizations do not begin approaching talent management and hiring in this manner, they will continue to go through cycles with no growth from hiring or attrition of their current employee population.

 

Conclusion

Success in managing talent is defined differently today than it has been in the past.

 

It is no longer simply determined by how many people a company hires or how fast it fills a position.

 

The real measure of success is based on how many people elect to stay in the organization and their reasons for doing so.

 

Creating a culture that allows employees to thrive, develop, and add value through retention is not about holding employees back from leaving. Rather, it is about providing an environment where they want to remain as part of the organization.

 

Retention demonstrates the strength of an organization’s leadership, culture, and long-term vision.

 

The organizations that will be successful in the future will be those who retain their best employees instead of those who hire the most.

 

Ultimately, sustainable growth does not come from an increase in headcount, but rather from continuity, trust, and an accumulated strength of people who choose to remain with the organization.

For further insights into the evolving workplace paradigm, visit  

JOIN OUR WHATSAPP CHANEL   

Dilip Kumar & Dipikka M
Latest posts by Dilip Kumar & Dipikka M (see all)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.