FIR Filed Against IndiGo Officials for Caste-Based Harassment: A Deepening Concern Over Workplace Discrimination
At the center of this controversy is 35-year-old Sharan A, an IndiGo employee from Bengaluru belonging to the Adi Dravida community—a Scheduled Caste group recognized by the Indian Constitution. Sharan’s complaint alleges a series of deeply disturbing events that unfolded during a company meeting at IndiGo’s corporate headquarters in Gurugram on April 28, 2025.
In a development that has shaken the Indian aviation industry and reignited debate over workplace inclusivity, an FIR has been filed against top officials at IndiGo, India’s largest airline, over accusations of caste-based harassment and systemic discrimination. The complaint, filed by a Bengaluru-based employee, has prompted a formal investigation by the Gurugram police and raised pressing questions about the efficacy of corporate mechanisms in addressing marginalized voices within India Inc.
A Cry for Justice from the Cabin Crew
At the center of this controversy is 35-year-old Sharan A, an IndiGo employee from Bengaluru belonging to the Adi Dravida community—a Scheduled Caste group recognized by the Indian Constitution. Sharan’s complaint alleges a series of deeply disturbing events that unfolded during a company meeting at IndiGo’s corporate headquarters in Gurugram on April 28, 2025.
According to the FIR, three senior colleagues—identified as Tapas Dey, Manish Sahni, and Captain Rahul Patil—allegedly hurled caste-based slurs at Sharan, humiliating him in the presence of others. Statements like “You are not fit to fly an aircraft, go back and stitch slippers,” and “You are not even worthy to lick my shoe,” were not only demeaning but, if proven, constitute a serious violation of both legal and ethical norms in the workplace.
A Pattern of Discrimination
What makes this case particularly alarming is that Sharan’s allegations extend beyond a single incident. The FIR describes a broader pattern of hostility: unjustified warning letters, unexplained salary deductions, curtailment of approved sick leave, cancellation of employee travel privileges, and relentless pressure to resign from his position.
Sharan also claims he approached IndiGo’s internal channels for redressal, including the office of the CEO and the company’s Ethics Committee, but received no response. Left with no other option, he filed a Zero FIR in Bengaluru, which was subsequently transferred to the DLF Phase-1 police station in Gurugram—the jurisdiction where the alleged incident took place.
Legal Action Under Stringent Provisions
Gurugram police have confirmed that an FIR has been registered under multiple provisions, including the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act—legislation specifically designed to prevent and penalize caste-based violence and discrimination. Additionally, charges have been filed under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code, including those related to criminal intimidation, intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, and use of criminal force.
A senior official from the Gurugram Police stated, “We are treating this matter with the gravity it deserves. A detailed investigation is underway, and action will be taken based on evidence and findings.”
IndiGo Responds: Denial and Declaration
In response to mounting media attention and public scrutiny, IndiGo released a formal statement refuting the allegations. “IndiGo upholds a zero-tolerance policy towards any form of discrimination, harassment, or bias and remains firmly committed to being an inclusive and respectful workplace,” the airline said through a spokesperson.
The company also emphasized its willingness to cooperate fully with law enforcement authorities and reaffirmed its dedication to upholding fairness, integrity, and employee rights.
Between Policy and Practice: The Accountability Gap
On paper, many Indian corporations—including IndiGo—have adopted frameworks that promise equal opportunity, inclusivity, and a safe workplace. However, this case highlights the gap that often exists between lofty policy statements and actual lived experience for employees—particularly those from marginalized communities.
The situation has led to a wave of commentary from HR professionals, legal experts, and civil society organizations. “What this case reminds us is that workplace discrimination isn’t just a legacy issue—it’s very much alive and interwoven with institutional blind spots,” said Meera Nair, a labor rights lawyer based in Delhi. “The role of internal complaints mechanisms is critical. When those fail, it becomes a systemic problem, not just an individual grievance.”
A Test Case for Corporate India?
The allegations against IndiGo arrive at a time when India’s private sector is under increasing pressure to address diversity and inclusion with tangible outcomes—not just corporate social responsibility statements or annual reports.
Several analysts view this case as a test of corporate India’s ability—and willingness—to tackle difficult truths. “This is a wake-up call,” said Dr. Ravi Tandon, professor of Human Resource Management at a leading business school. “Companies can no longer treat issues of discrimination as isolated lapses. They need to embed inclusion into culture, leadership training, and accountability mechanisms.”
The Human Toll of Workplace Discrimination
Beyond the legal and corporate dimensions, Sharan’s account also sheds light on the emotional and psychological toll faced by individuals battling workplace harassment—especially when layered with the stigma and historical weight of caste discrimination. Feeling unsupported by internal channels, Sharan turned to the justice system, a path many see as both courageous and exhausting.
While some voices on social media have commended his decision to come forward, others have called for swift and transparent action by both IndiGo and law enforcement agencies. Civil rights groups are also rallying around the case, arguing that it could become a milestone for awareness and reform if handled with integrity.
Moving Forward: What’s at Stake
As the investigation proceeds, the case is likely to generate broader debate not only within aviation but across sectors. Will this become a defining moment that prompts corporate India to double down on inclusion and justice? Or will it be dismissed as yet another isolated controversy?
One thing is clear: the outcome of this case will be closely watched—not just by lawyers and HR professionals, but by employees across the country who are quietly hoping that their own rights, dignity, and humanity are taken seriously at the workplace.
At a time when India is striving to position itself as a global business hub, how companies treat their most vulnerable employees could speak louder than any marketing campaign. For further insights into the evolving workplace paradigm, visit
- How this Healthcare Company Prioritizes Career Growth, Internal Mobility, and Continuous Learning to Retain Talent - July 24, 2025
- Why Are Dell Employees Reeling Under Work Pressure? - July 23, 2025
- How an software engineer become HCM architect to align enterprise solutions in Human-Centered HR Digitization - July 19, 2025
