A Philadelphia based Company fined for worker classification in gig economy
Gopuff, a Philadelphia-based consumer goods and food delivery company, was fined for workplace discrimination.
A Philadelphia based Company fined for worker classification in gig economy
A Philadelphia-based company was fined for misclassifying its employees in the gig economy in the USA.
Gopuff, a Philadelphia-based consumer goods and food delivery company, was fined for workplace discrimination. Gopuff, a delivery service company, operated in hundreds of cities across the United States and the United Kingdom.
The company has been rapidly expanding in recent years and has raised billions of dollars in funding, with SoftBank Group Corp. among its investors. It is becoming increasingly popular among consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic because it provides a contactless and quick way to get essential items delivered to their doorstep.
However, the company has also faced scrutiny and legal challenges regarding its worker classification practices. Gopuff, like other app-based services like Uber, Lyft, and Grubhub, has relied on independent contractors to perform delivery services, which are frequently less expensive than hiring employees directly.
However, given that they might not have access to the same benefits and legal protections as regular employees of the company, it has been questioned whether these workers should be considered employees.
After receiving complaints from both former and current employees, the Massachusetts Attorney General’s office opened an investigation into the company’s worker classification practices in the Gopuff case.
The penalties bring attention to the growing problem of worker classification in the gig economy, which has become a source of disagreement between app-based businesses and legislators.
While some claim that having the status of an independent contractor allows for greater flexibility for employees, others claim that it deprives them of fundamental protections and benefits.
This problem is far from being resolved, as evidenced by the ongoing legal disputes between app-based businesses and legislators in Massachusetts and California.
- How this non-banking finance company Goes on AI-Based HR Function Transformation - December 24, 2024
- Withdraw PF from ATMs Starting 2025: Labour Ministry - December 12, 2024
- Oral Complaints Cannot Replace Written Complaints Under PoSH Act: Kerala High Court - December 12, 2024
