Amazon CEO Accused of Labour Law Violation: A Deep Dive
Andy Jassy’s comments pertaining to unionisation during public interviews in the past have landed him in trouble with the National...
LITIGATION NEWS
Karnataka High Court: No Limitation for Filing Complaint Under Section 33-A of Industrial Disputes Act
The case was heard by a Single Bench of Justice Shivashankar Amarannavar (Karnataka High Court). The writ petition was filed...
Supervisory Role Remains Despite Supervising Non-Direct Employees : Bombay High Court
Justice Marne stated, “In a given organization, it may happen that a Manager or Supervisor may have to supervise the...
Karnataka High Court Declares International Worker Provisions of EPF Act Unconstitutional
Members of the Karnataka Employers Association, led by their President, B.C. Prabhakar, had challenged the validity of these provisions in...
Employee Appointed Through Valid Process Can’t Be Denied Regularization If Performing Permanent Role For Considerable Time: SC
The Supreme Court ruled that employees serving continuously in regular capacities should not be denied regularization based on procedural formalities....
Landmark Supreme Court Verdict Upholds Women’s Right to Childcare Leave
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court declared that two-year childcare leave, alongside mandatory maternity leave, is a constitutional right...
Termination Of Services Without Disciplinary Enquiry Violates Principles of Natural Justice : Supreme Court
The Judgment authored by Justice Sandeep Mehta observed that the decision to terminate the services of the appellant from the...
‘Slapping superior is grave misconduct’: HC set aside Tribunal order, restored termination of employee for slapping the superior
Bombay HC upheld HPCL workman termination for slapping supervisor, deeming it grave misconduct. CGIT imposed lesser punishment, but HC agreed...
Bharti Airtel v. A.S. Raghavendra: Employee cannot dictate employment terms, employer’s appraisal prevails: SC
Bharti Airtel case ruling by the Indian Supreme Court, an employee cannot dictate terms of employment to their employer. The...
ID Act 1947: Employees Working As Manual, Skilled & Unskilled Workers Are Workmen under ID Act 1947: Bombay HC
The Industrial Tribunal's ruling, which determined that the employees in question were, in fact, workers under Section 2(s) of the...
