Karnataka High Court: No Limitation for Filing Complaint Under Section 33-A of Industrial Disputes Act
The case was heard by a Single Bench of Justice Shivashankar Amarannavar (Karnataka High Court). The writ petition was filed...
The case was heard by a Single Bench of Justice Shivashankar Amarannavar (Karnataka High Court). The writ petition was filed...
Justice Marne stated, “In a given organization, it may happen that a Manager or Supervisor may have to supervise the...
Members of the Karnataka Employers Association, led by their President, B.C. Prabhakar, had challenged the validity of these provisions in...
The Supreme Court ruled that employees serving continuously in regular capacities should not be denied regularization based on procedural formalities....
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court declared that two-year childcare leave, alongside mandatory maternity leave, is a constitutional right...
The Judgment authored by Justice Sandeep Mehta observed that the decision to terminate the services of the appellant from the...
Bombay HC upheld HPCL workman termination for slapping supervisor, deeming it grave misconduct. CGIT imposed lesser punishment, but HC agreed...
Bharti Airtel case ruling by the Indian Supreme Court, an employee cannot dictate terms of employment to their employer. The...
The Industrial Tribunal's ruling, which determined that the employees in question were, in fact, workers under Section 2(s) of the...
A significant ruling was rendered in the case of WA of 2023 by the Kerala High Court, which was presided...