Court held Leave Encashment Is Not A Bounty; But A Right Of Employee : Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court’s ruling reinforces the idea that leave encashment is not a discretionary favor, but a legitimate right...
bombay high court
Supervisory Role Remains Despite Supervising Non-Direct Employees : Bombay High Court
Justice Marne stated, “In a given organization, it may happen that a Manager or Supervisor may have to supervise the...
Termination Without Disciplinary Inquiry and Compensation unlawful, Pay 25 Lakhs : Bombay High Court
The employer-employee connection was determined by the court using the six standards outlined in Balwant Rai Saluja v. Air India...
“Demand of accommodation is not Every employee’s matter of right”: Bombay HC
The regulations "demonstrate that every employee cannot demand accommodation as a matter of right," according to Justice R. N. Laddha....
The CPFC directed the RPFC to begin recovery proceedings under section 8F of the EPF and MP Act of 1952.
The respondents are ordered that there shall be no order directing the assessee to deposit the amount within the appeal...
Employer is not entitled to terminate an employee summarily on the ground of suppression of material facts : Bombay High Court
A Division Bench comprising Justice Rohit B. Deo and Justice Anil L. Pansare said that oppression by a person in...
